The road to hell is paved with good intentions, so they say. Does this describe the UK’s Prevent counter terrorism programme?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions, so they say. Does this describe the UK’s Prevent counter terrorism programme?
You would think that doing something to combat terrorism but only creates more terrorism would make you stop doing that, right? Tell China.
Why is it that jihadis, who are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Muslims worldwide are not called ‘Islamophobes’?
Terrorism chicken littles have a lot to answer for when their predictions of waves of violence do not come to pass, as in the case of RWE.
There is so much wrong about calls to repatriate Canadians who joined ISIS: let’s start with those who see them as ‘victims’
The Canadian government appears to be incapable of making good decisions on where to buy sensitive technology, electing to deal with countries which are not our friends
How is it that the Canadian government is not taking seriously enough the presence of PRC ‘police stations’ on our soil?
You would think a country’s leader would have a good idea what its intelligence agencies have authority to do. Then again, this is Canada we are talking about.
Intelligence agencies work hard to provide the best advice possible to senior government leaders: you would think these mandarins would at least read what they send.
We constantly hear or read that this or that terrorist group has been “defeated”: how much stock should we place in such reports (hint: very little)