Categories
Perspectives

May 16, 2009: Acid attack on crowd in Hong Kong

On May 16, 2009 an unknown person threw two bottles of acid into a crowd in a popular shopping district in downtown Hong Kong, injuring 30 people.

HONG KONG – There are times when the ‘terror’ aspect of terrorism is a good fit even if we cannot prove the act was indeed terrorism.

The linguist in me is always interested in the intersection between language and how it is used. Etymology, the study of words’ origins, is actually what got me into linguistics in the first place and took me pretty far (15 years teaching undergraduates at Carleton University in Ottawa and a partially-finished PhD from U Toronto: note the phrase ‘partially-finished’, i.e. I am NOT a ‘doctor’).

Today’s attack is right up this alley. When we talk about terrorism we cannot help but notice that the root is ‘terror‘ (if you care it comes from the Latin word ‘terrore’, meaning, um, ‘terror, fright, dread’). And indeed there is a lot of ‘terror‘ in ‘terrorism‘. But not all things that instill terror are terrorist acts?

Lost yet?

On this day in 2009

An unknown person threw two bottles of acid into a crowd in a popular shopping district in downtown Hong Kong, injuring 30 people. This was the second such attack in five months in the neighborhood.

We will find out whether the two cases were done by the same person as soon as possible. Right now, we do not rule out any possibilities.

Hong Kong police superintendent Leung Ka-ming

No one was ever arrested in this attack and as a consequence no motive was uncovered. Hence, calling it an act of terrorism would be impossible. Still, would YOU want a couple of bottles of acid thrown at you? Not me!

Read More Today in Terrorism

Listen to the Latest Borealis Podcast

By Phil Gurski

Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. Phil is a 32-year veteran of CSE and CSIS and the author of six books on terrorism.

Leave a Reply