We know a lot about terrorism, its genesis, and its characteristics so why do we pussy foot around the precise use of language?
Search: “netherlands”
We found 100 results for your search.
Why are governments so reluctant to release corroborated, accurate information in the wake of violent attacks when such a move can deflate further violence?
An alleged jihadi attack on a military chaplain in Ireland possibly tied to ISIS just shows how prevalent this threat is.
Terrorism analysis demands consistency and accuracy across the board: this entails the need to talk about Jewish terrorism in Israel
Allegations that three teens planned to target a Taylor Swift event for ISIS should surprise no one and serve to show jihadis are still the #1 threat
Authorities need to take more action in the aftermath of violent acts in releasing info to help prevent uniformed and violent reaction
Many naively believe that terrorist groups a la Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc. eventually disappear: the reality is they are long lasting threats to national security and public safety
Canadians are woefully ignorant of terrorists from BC who perpetrated the 1985 Air India attack, and few think it can happen again.
Criticism of a state over its acts is an acceptable form of protest: what happens when that state is Israel and opposition turns to anti-Semitism?
Solid intelligence pointing to unwanted and dangerous Chinese interference in Canada and multiple levels has been collected and shared for decades and ignored. Why?