Categories
Quick Hits

Why are Canadian courts so inconsistent when it comes to terrorism?

A recent US court decision to sentence a Canadian ISIS jihadi to life behind bars highlights the differences in terrorism cases on either side of the 49th parallel.

Buzzsprout Quick Hits – Episode 198 – Why are Canadian courts so inconsistent when it comes to terrorism

A US court just found a Canadian ISIS jihadi guilty of providing material support to a terrorist group and sentenced to life in jail.  If he had been in a Canadian court it is very likely he would have received a slap on the wrist.  Why the difference?  In this Quick Hits podcast Borealis President and CEO Phil Gurski weighs in on the inadequacies of the Canadian justice system when it comes to terrorism.

Islamic State group: Canadian narrator of propaganda videos jailed – BBC News

Canadian was ‘prolific propagandist’ in ISIS, U.S. prosecutors say | Globalnews.ca

About the host Phil Gurski

Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. He worked as a senior strategic analyst at CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) from 2001-2015, specializing in violent Islamist-inspired homegrown terrorism and radicalisation. He is the author of six books on terrorism, including the most recent The Peaceable Kingdom: A history of terrorism in Canada from Confederation to the present.

By Phil Gurski

Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. Phil is a 32-year veteran of CSE and CSIS and the author of six books on terrorism.

Leave a Reply