You would think that a government would list terrorist groups for specific reasons (prosecution among them). Is it as easy as all that?

Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. Phil is a 32-year veteran of CSE and CSIS and the author of six books on terrorism.
You would think that a government would list terrorist groups for specific reasons (prosecution among them). Is it as easy as all that?
More than 70 people killed in terrorist attacks this week, the vast majority at the hands of jihadis: again not one single right wing attack anywhere
Afghanistan is now again under the medieval reign of the Taliban: what does this mean for the country and the region?
Governments in liberal, secular democracies cannot run roughshod over fundamental rights and the law, even where national security is involved.
Hindu extremism is a growing problem in India: do we have to have to worry about attacks outside South Asia?
Jihadis dominated the global terrorist scene once again, although a cult-like group in DRC did carry out two attacks. RWE? Zero.
Terrorists are equal opportunity actors as a rule and this means that they may also target those who otherwise sponsor terrorist groups
This blog is an attempt to track terrorist attacks worldwide on a weekly basis. While recognising the challenges in defining ‘terrorism’, the incidents listed here will be limited to attacks committed – or claimed – by known terrorist groups (Al Qaeda, Islamic State, FARC, etc.) or those where there is a clear underlying ideological, religious […]
Law enforcement agencies are placed in a tough spot when it comes to maintaining public order, especially when it comes to protests
The perception that violence and extremism are the rise and getting worse, especially far right terrorism, may not be accurate.