A court ruling that tries to force the Canadian government to repatriate those who joined ISIS of their own free will is daft
Category: Perspectives
Sikh extremists in Canada carried out the largest act of aviation terrorism prior to 9/11 in 1985: do they still pose a threat?
If arson is committed for political purposes does that not make it an act of terrorism? Not in Canada it seems!
Looking back at a terrorist plot 15 years later only to force it through the filter of ‘racism’ is just plain wrong and unhelpful.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions, so they say. Does this describe the UK’s Prevent counter terrorism programme?
You would think that doing something to combat terrorism but only creates more terrorism would make you stop doing that, right? Tell China.
Why is it that jihadis, who are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Muslims worldwide are not called ‘Islamophobes’?
Terrorism chicken littles have a lot to answer for when their predictions of waves of violence do not come to pass, as in the case of RWE.
There is so much wrong about calls to repatriate Canadians who joined ISIS: let’s start with those who see them as ‘victims’
The Canadian government appears to be incapable of making good decisions on where to buy sensitive technology, electing to deal with countries which are not our friends