The 2nd part of an interview with terrorism specialist Phil Gurski on religions that become hazardous. This episode discusses Judaism, Zionism, Anti-Semitism, Atheism, Marxism, the role of CSIS, etc.
Search: “national security”
We found 1,040 results for your search.
Privacy and our spy agencies
Spies act in the shadows for obvious reasons: does this mean they are constrained by privacy issues?
The debate over what to call terrorism is an eternal one. Where incels fit in, if they do, will also go on for a while.
How can Western democratic states use surveillance technology to monitor who has COVID-19 and still respect privacy laws?
The federal government is considering making it an offence to knowingly spread misinformation that could harm people in this time of COVID-19.
How recent setbacks, real or perceived, could lead some to activists taking the law into their own hands.
The perils of ‘terrorism prediction’
No one can predict the future and that includes terrorism ‘experts’.
We see our intelligence sector as there to protect us from threats like terrorism and foreign espionage – what about pandemics?
Intelligence agencies really should have more of a dialogue with those who support them financially, i.e. the taxpayers/citizens.
Canada is still considering Huawei as a supplier of 5G, despite the opposition of some of our allies, including the U.S. Should the Trudeau government choose Huawei, there could be real implications for intelligence sharing.
