We see our intelligence sector as there to protect us from threats like terrorism and foreign espionage – what about pandemics?
Search: “national security”
We found 1,003 results for your search.
Intelligence agencies really should have more of a dialogue with those who support them financially, i.e. the taxpayers/citizens.
Canada is still considering Huawei as a supplier of 5G, despite the opposition of some of our allies, including the U.S. Should the Trudeau government choose Huawei, there could be real implications for intelligence sharing.
Categories
COVID-19: An opening for terrorists?
Even ISIS is afraid of COVID-19, suggesting we may not see an uptick in attacks seeking to take advantage of a possible skeleton crew in security and intelligence agencies – read more here!
I am uncertain what GBA+ analysis entails but I am willing to give proponents the benefit of the doubt – for now.
We all recognise the right to express dissent: so what do we do when groups espousing violence jump on the bandwagon?
There is no such thing as zero-risk: we need to have systems in place to measure danger as best we can.
Every nation has a sovereign right to determine who gets in: immigration is still a net gain for us however.
Law enforcement and security agencies use a wealth of sources in their investigations, including openly-available data.
About Us Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. He worked as a senior strategic analyst at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) from 2001-2015, specializing in violent Islamist-inspired homegrown terrorism and radicalisation. He is the author of six previous books on terrorism. Phil Gurski is the President and […]