How recent setbacks, real or perceived, could lead some to activists taking the law into their own hands.
Search: “national security”
We found 917 results for your search.
The perils of ‘terrorism prediction’
No one can predict the future and that includes terrorism ‘experts’.
We see our intelligence sector as there to protect us from threats like terrorism and foreign espionage – what about pandemics?
Intelligence agencies really should have more of a dialogue with those who support them financially, i.e. the taxpayers/citizens.
Canada is still considering Huawei as a supplier of 5G, despite the opposition of some of our allies, including the U.S. Should the Trudeau government choose Huawei, there could be real implications for intelligence sharing.
COVID-19: An opening for terrorists?
Even ISIS is afraid of COVID-19, suggesting we may not see an uptick in attacks seeking to take advantage of a possible skeleton crew in security and intelligence agencies – read more here!
I am uncertain what GBA+ analysis entails but I am willing to give proponents the benefit of the doubt – for now.
We all recognise the right to express dissent: so what do we do when groups espousing violence jump on the bandwagon?
There is no such thing as zero-risk: we need to have systems in place to measure danger as best we can.
Every nation has a sovereign right to determine who gets in: immigration is still a net gain for us however.